RACI Responsibility Matrix
Clarify who executes, owns, advises, and receives each outcome
- Difficulty
- Easy
- Time to result
- ~days to results
- Steps
- 5
- Confidence
- 99%
The RACI Responsibility Matrix assigns each participating role one or more explicit relationships to a process or outcome. Responsible roles perform concrete tasks required to produce the result. The accountable role owns the final outcome and is answerable for whether standards and deadlines are met. Consulted roles provide input before or during execution, while informed roles receive relevant updates or the completed outcome. By distinguishing these relationships, teams avoid vague exchanges such as assuming someone else had ownership. The matrix is especially useful when embedded in an SOP or project plan before work begins. Its output is a shared map of execution, ownership, advice, and communication that exposes missing owners, unnecessary participants, and unclear handoffs while there is still time to correct them.
Origin
RACI is an established organizational matrix rather than a Jasmine Star Brands invention. The company adopted it within its SOP template to create explicit ownership and eliminate confusion about who is responsible for business outcomes.
Core principles
- 01Execution and accountability are different responsibilities
- 02Every outcome needs an identifiable owner
- 03Consultation should be intentional rather than assumed
- 04Relevant stakeholders need defined communication
- 05Role clarity prevents work from falling between people
How to run it
- 1
Identify Responsible Roles
List the roles that have concrete tasks and directly contribute to completing the process. There may be several responsible roles in a cross-functional project.
Pro tip Start from the project's task list to identify who actually performs work.
Watch out Do not confuse everyone who receives a task or notification with a direct executor.
- 2
Name the Accountable Role
Select the role that owns the final result and answers for its quality, timeliness, and completion. Make the point of accountability unambiguous.
Pro tip Ask who receives either the congratulations or the question about why the outcome failed.
Watch out Multiple competing accountable owners can recreate the ambiguity the matrix is meant to solve.
- 3
Identify Consulted Roles
List specialists or stakeholders whose input is needed to achieve the outcome. Define where their advice enters the process.
Pro tip Use not applicable when no consultation is necessary rather than leaving the field blank.
Watch out Treating every stakeholder as consulted can create approval bottlenecks.
- 4
Identify Informed Roles
List the roles that must receive progress information, notice of completion, or the final outcome without owning its production. Specify the communication point in the process.
Pro tip Include downstream teams that need awareness to support customers or launch related work.
Watch out Being informed does not automatically make a role responsible for delivery.
- 5
Audit the Matrix
Review the assignments for missing accountability, duplicate ownership, and roles that appear unnecessarily. Confirm the team understands the distinctions before work starts.
Pro tip Test the matrix by asking each person to state their role in one sentence.
Watch out A matrix that exists only inside documentation will not resolve confusion unless the team uses it.
In the wild
For an opt-in project, copywriters, graphic designers, and marketing strategists may be responsible for producing components. A manager is accountable for standards and deadlines, specialists may be consulted, and Customer Success is informed so it can test the opt-in and understand what customers will receive.
→ Every participating department understands whether it executes, owns, advises, or receives the project outcome.
A marketing team assigns campaign production to responsible specialists, final launch ownership to the marketing director, legal review to a consulted adviser, and sales and support teams as informed stakeholders.
→ The launch proceeds without duplicate ownership or missed stakeholder communication.
Common mistakes
Confusing Responsible With Accountable
The people performing tasks are not necessarily the person who owns the final result. Failing to separate these roles weakens accountability.
Leaving Empty Roles Unexplained
A blank field creates doubt about whether the role was considered. Explicitly mark a category as not applicable when appropriate.
Assigning People Instead of Roles
Using personal names makes the matrix fragile when staffing changes. Evergreen documentation should identify organizational roles.
Is it for you?
Best for
It is best for cross-functional projects involving several contributors, managers, advisers, or downstream stakeholders.
Not ideal for
It is not ideal for a trivial individual task where one person both performs and owns the entire outcome.
From the transcript
“Now, RACI is a matrix for clarifying roles and responsibilities within an organization.”
“And that means responsible who has an asana task to complete in the entire flow.”
“The third letter is C and that is for who's consulted. Who needs to be consulted in achieving the outcome. And lastly AI who is…”
From the episode
Why Systems Are the Secret to 8-Figure Growth